Sigh. . . .where to begin. It appears that Tremendo muted petitbonom ( I do not know why). this decision was immediately rescinded without consultation and tremendo left. He sent me this text prior to leaving.

"playerafar has unmuted petitbonom and he's done this unilaterally, without consulting the group owner"

We have a situation where an admin makes a decision and its immediately undermined and rescinded by another admin without consultation, which in my opinion leads to confusion and lacks cohesion. We should reach a consensus.

Whats the solution? It appears to me that when an admin makes a decision it should stand until other available admin look at it and reach a consensus. This lets admin act with freedom but also has certain checks and balances against dubious decisions. Admin should be free to act of their own volition while keeping checks on more weighty decisions, hopefully to avoid any lasting damage.

Please note I am not alleging anything against tremendo or playerafar, they acted both within the constraints of their respective consciences and in good faith, i just think it might have been better handled, thats all. I invite all thoughts from other admin.

Open Ideas administrators

Super Admins